Thanks, but I do not think you have to apologize. In fact, I think leaning towards skepticism when someone presents new ideas is probably correct. You gotta flip and grill these new ideas for a while, before they come out good!
I welcome skeptics, but I suggest that when you can’t produce an argument anymore, you should probably reconsider your stance, from a clean slate. I know that my written communication can improve a lot, and that there is also a language barrier. But I still have not encountered any real argument against what I presented as a definition, other than that the 3b cascade is a somewhat fictional anchor to it. But that is something I have admitted from the very beginning, and I gave an account of the real truth too. Either way, I am still super happy to discuss with anyone that is sincere about the matter.